Back to Previous Page
BUILD ON GLOBAL FINANCING
Back to previous page
Back to Previous Page
Capital Seeds Corporation represents an office for Financial Reporting and Related Products, a line of
communication between lenders and low-income borrowers and also a web-based research and
brainstorming service to promote modern financing schemes to the microfinance industry.  Capital
Seeds comparative advantage resides in the fact that we clearly understand the mission of “serving the
poor” alongside with the purely “commercial incentive of making profit”. We can integrate these different
agendas and create a synergy that could optimize the Capital Structure of Microfinance Institutions.   

We attribute the pattern of stagnation/recession of Low Developing Countries to deficient investment,
stressed particularly in machinery, technology, training and market development. As we are on the
demand-side theory of economy, we believe in package to stimulate demand in order to reduce
unemployment and shake off economic stagnation. One approach to stimulate demand in Low
Developing Countries is an Integrated Model of Business Expansion and Development of Rural Financial
Markets. The Core Question, where the Capital will come from?  

Let’s have a look together at what happened with the evolution of the Microfinance industry. In the
formative years of microfinance, “traditional public donors were the angel investors”, to repeat the words
of Elizabeth Littlefield, Chief Executive Officer of the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor. Donors
provided the seed capital for promoting Microfinance Institutions; it was like financing Research &
Development.

Over the years, hundred of Microfinance Institutions became profitable, promoted financial
transparency, increased disclosure standards, attracted a flow of money from institutional investors and
commercial banks and transformed themselves into credit-worthy investment.  Based on the experience
and evolution of the microfinance industry, we could say that Donors bring Seed Capital to test ideas in
the fields. But when it comes to scale, performance and efficiency, funding from international donors is
replaced by private investment.

But, Microfinance itself can not create the effect of raising a community out of poverty; the community
needs also what the industry calls Support Services or Non Financial Services.  For Example, small
farmers in a geographic area growing cocoa beans needs patios to dry the wet beans, training to learn
how to process the beans according to the requirements of a preferential niche market, a warehouse to
secure stocks before a truck comes and pick the bags, communication infrastructure, a dynamic
marketing services to penetrate niche and preferential markets and also an understanding of price
trends and fluctuations.

A Microfinance Program shaped for Cocoa Beans Sector (for example) in a Low Developing Country, to
be successful, should bring not only the required working capital to collect and assembly the beans, but
should set a financing package taking into consideration training, processing activities, storage and
transportation, infrastructure building, electrification, marketing and production; that’s what we call an
“Integrated Package of  Business Expansion and Development of Rural Financial Markets”.

We clearly understand the challenges facing by the development of Rural Financial Markets such as:
fluctuation of local exchange rates, uncontrolled and seasonal price of agricultural products, lack of
regulation in lending practices, weak ownership documentation of rural assets, low possibility of
diversification and risk mitigation, almost no liquidity of stakes. Local Technocracy in synergy with
Political Government and with the participation of Territorial Communities will address these issues,
bring answer and facilitate Business Expansion and the Development of Rural Financial Markets.

Developing Rural Financial Market requires a two-step transition: 1) a better valuation of the current
production in rural areas; 2) the increase in income that will follow, will raise the demand for other
products and lead to a structural transformation from an agricultural based to a non agricultural based
economy (with the hypothesis of no transfer of the additional income out of the rural areas).The
selected Microfinance Institutions will be responsible to fund infrastructure for production,
communication and transportation, training and also give loan to small enterprises benefiting from the
new built infrastructure. In this model, The Microfinance institutions will work closely with the Territorial
Communities during the strategic planning process and during the implementation and execution to
have the local population identifies itself with the package and also develop more autonomy.  The model
does not minimize the role of the already established commercial banks. They will continue to mobilize
savings from households and established businesses and also continue playing their role in the transfer
of remittance. Commercial Banks would represent an alternate channel of financing and they would
compete with the microfinance institutions.

However, the private capital market will not provide with the start-up cost. For example, if the global
capital market would find an opportunity to invest billions of dollars to develop a Specialty Flavor of
Coffee or a wild clone of natural cocoa beans in a specific Low Developing Country (based on the model
of Ivory Coast or Ghana for the Cocoa Beans), the Microfinance Institutions and the Territorial
Communities would take over and capitalize on the Research and experiments previously funded by the
Government, the International Donors (USAID, Lome Convention, …) and Local Well- Established
Businessmen.

Ian Callaghan from the Microfinance Section of Morgan Stanley wrote: “key shareholders, such as the
International Financial Institutions, are often reluctant to free up stakes” in Microfinance Institutions.
Some of the Stakes may also belong to Local Non Governmental Organizations, to Territorial
Communities and even Part of the Eminent Domain of the Country. We believe there could be possibility
of negotiation to free up stakes and use the money to develop other territories and open new markets.

The momentum is there for the Economic Revolution and Poverty Alleviation. It will be a long process for
every single Low Developing Country, maybe as long as and as expensive as opening a new oil refinery
or building a new model of aircraft or spaceship, or launching a new drug on the market. We can do it;
Dubai did it. It is a question of making our mind set for the work.